Home / Malaysia Bankruptcy Law / Business & Consumer Bankruptcy Law 1st Mention

1st Mention (modified 0 times) VIctory I have went for my 1st mention today. For newbie - actually Notis Kehadiran is NOT needed if you go for the mention. 1) What should I do next while waiting for my 2nd mention date coming in middile of Feb? The court do not allow more than a month nowadays to find a lawyer. 2) What documents should I start to preparing now? 02 Feb, 2012 22:55:39

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) virnicia What happened at the first mention? Did the judge set a dateline for you to file your defence? 03 Feb, 2012 08:07:02

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) Victory There is not much thing happened in the 1st mention, it was simple, the judge allow me to find a lawyer and set me another new mention date but the judge did not set a dateline for me to file my defence yet. 1) So, should I start to prepare any documents now? What doc should get ready first? 2) Should there any problem if I set my 2nd mention date for few cases on the same date to save my transport? 03 Feb, 2012 12:43:55

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) Leroy VIctory, What is your end objective? Fight all the way to Court Of Appeal at Putrajaya? Pay back once you have the money? Leaving the country soon so you just need to buy a few months time? If it is the latter, the you need to prepare a defence and an affidavit, then file them. 03 Feb, 2012 15:59:51

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) notalawyer If it is the latter, the you need to prepare a defence and an affidavit, then file them. The information above is not accurate. At the 2nd mention you just say you are still looking for lawyer. If the judge set a deadline for your defence, then only you prepare and file the defence. If the bank lawyer files a Notis Permohonan for Aturan 26A, then only you file a reply affidavit. In the meantime, just look around for holes for your defence. 03 Feb, 2012 17:02:11

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) Leroy VIctory, It is only INaccurate if you are going for a 2nd mention. Are you sure your next court date is a mention and not a hearing? More often than not, for "kuching kurap" cases, after the 1st mention, the following court date will be the hearing. 03 Feb, 2012 18:35:44

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) notalawyer More often than not, for "kuching kurap" cases, after the 1st mention, the following court date will be the hearing. Not really. The hearing cannot start if the defence has not been filed and no Application has been made. Sometimes 5 or 6 mentions happen before a hearing. So, don't worry. 03 Feb, 2012 20:05:41

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) natalie Profile | Email Victory, juz prepare ur statement of defenc n bring it wt u on 2 nd mention ( juz in case d court ask for ur defenc. If x, keep it until d 3rd mention). Dunt file yet. But, Normally they won't ask. So, 2nd mention u go to court, inform court u stil xget lawyer. Ask for anor date. Then, judge wil fix final mention to get lawyer OR if stil xget lawyer then to file ur statmnt of defence b4 d 3 rd mention. regards, natalie 04 Feb, 2012 17:02:47

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) Vitory If the judge set a dateline for defence in 2nd mention, means I can file the defence on the same day(if prepared) so I don't have to go to mahkamah again purposely for the filing before the dateline? 06 Feb, 2012 00:12:00

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) natalie Profile | Email Dunt file it on 2nd date itself. If ur purpose is to buy time. File it 2 or 3 days before 3rd mention. Dunt forget to serve 1 copy to plaintiff's lawyer regards, natalie 06 Feb, 2012 09:29:43

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) Victory How many copies have to prepare for the statement of defence? 1 copy for filing, 1 copy for plaintiff's lawyer = 2 copies enough? After filing with RM4 paid, should I photostat this copy and send it to plaintiff's lawyer OR I just prepare 2 copies, 1 for filing and 1 for plaintiff's lawyer? 06 Feb, 2012 22:12:31

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) natalie Profile | Email 1 copy for filing, 1 copy for pf's lawyer n 1 copy for u. All ori copy. No photocopy regards, natalie 06 Feb, 2012 22:28:11

RE:1st Mention (modified 0 times) Victory notalawyer, is my defence looks ok? I need your advice on this. HELP! XXXXX (all headings as in William's book) PEMBELAAN Pembelaan Am 1. Defendan menafikan perenggan 3 kerana defendan tidak pernah tinggal atau berkerja di alamat kedua 88, Jalan xxxxxxxxx. 2. Defendan menafikan perenggan 4 kerana plaintif yang mengajak defendan mendapatkan kemudahan tersebut dan bukan defendan yang minta daripada plaintif. 3. Defendan menafikan semua perenggan 5 hingga 12d) kerana defendan tidak pernah manandatangani dan menerima sebarang Dokumen Perjanjian seperti yang dirujuk oleh plaintif, defenden belum boleh menjawab tuntutan-tuntutan itu sehingga mendapat salinan dokumen tersebut. 4. Tanpa surat asal dan Dokumen Perjanjian untuk tawaran kemudahan dari plaintif kepada defendan, segala terma dan syarat Perjanjian termasuk pernyataan tuntutan Plaintif adalah tidak boleh diterima pakai. Ini adalah kerana Plaintif gagal membuktikan bahawa jumlah tuntutan wang pokok, berserta faedah dan lain-lain tuntutan bayaran yang difailkan terhadap Defendan di dalam saman Plaintif adalah betul dan benar. Pembelaan Tertentu 1. Defendan adalah seorang xxxxx selama X tahun. Defendan tidak pernah berkerja selama X tahun. Alamat kedua 88, Jalan XXXXXX juga tidak pernah menjadi alamat tinggal defendan. 2. Defendan tidak pernah meminta sebarang pinjaman/kemudahan tersebut daripada plaintif, seorang pegawai plaintif bernama XXXX yang mengajak defendan mendapatkan kemudahan tersebut dengan kata-kata manis yang mengelirukan. 3. Defendan telah memberitahu pegawai tersebut bahawa defendan tidak ada sebarang pendapatan kerana seorang xxxxxx, defendan juga tidak pernah memberikan sebarang bukti yang kukuh untuk membuktikan defendan mempunyai sebarang pendapatan. Tetapi plaintif masih berkeras untuk memberikan kemudahan tersebut kepada defendan. 4. Pegawai tersebut juga berjanji defendan akan mendapatkan PA insuran sebanyak RMxxxxxx secara Percuma jika kemudahan tersebut diluluskan. Tetapi selama ini, defendan tidak pernah dan belum dapat sebarang sijil insuran daripada plaintif untuk membuktikan defendan telah mendapat insuran percuma tersebut. 5. Defendan tidak pernah menandatangani sebarang dokumen atau perjanjian bagi kemudahan tersebut, plaintif juga tidak pernah memberikan sebarang dokumen atau perjanjian kepada defendan. Ini telah melanggar akta kontrak jika kemudahan tersebut mempunyai sebarang terma dan syarat. XXXXX (all bottom lines as in William's book) 07 Feb, 2012 23:32:49

Disclaimer - Please Read Carefully

These Bulletin Board pages are intended as a public service primarily to allow non-lawyers and lawyers to share experiences and opinions with other non-lawyers and lawyers. They are NOT intended to be a source of advertising, solicitation, legal advice, self-promotion or disparagement. Lawyerment assumes absolutely no responsibility for postings or their content. Visitors may post questions, comments and replies without prior review by Lawyerment, but we reserve the right to delete any postings (in whole or in part) for any reason at any time.
However, the fact that a posting remains on site NEVER means that it has been approved or endorsed by Lawyerment. By making a posting you are agreeing that the material you post becomes the property of Lawyerment. Lawyerment is a unit of Magnificent Communication. Visitors should exercise great caution when reading this (or any other) Bulletin Board. Be aware that those who post messages may not be who they claim to be. Never to rely on any advice in legal matters except from an attorney you have retained to represent you and your interests. To locate and retain an attorney we suggest you visit our Lawyerment Lawyers' Directory.
Click here to visit Lawyerment.com for 1000's of answers to legal questions. Please read our Privacy Policy and Disclaimer & Conditions Of Use.
Copyright © 1999-2011 Lawyerment.com. All rights reserved