Lawyerment Discussion Forum
The Malaysian Law Discussion Forum for All
Forum Home | Sign In | Sign Up | Search | Help | Lawyerment HomePost a New Message | Reply this Thread | Printer

Home / Malaysia Bankruptcy Law / Business & Consumer Bankruptcy Law
Employer EPF matter in COURT Case..
As an employer end up in Court case for not contributing EPF Fund to one of the employee..!!

New MessageEmployer EPF matter in COURT Case.. (modified 0 times) Jeantank
Dear All with due respect,

I am having this court case going on for third time hearing by tomorrow September 16th 2008. 1)If I decided NOT to GO or GO,what is the worst thing can happen to me??????? As i cant give any excuses anymore but just cant repay within 6 installments amounting to about 10,000.00 only?if 10-12 months then i think is possible tough but the court wont allowed that.As for my current situation i am jobless as a employer or employee due to economy crisis and partners ran away from AH Long.Let me brief further of my first hearing,whereby i do admitted to it.My 2nd hearing i didnt admit to it,then the interpreter said,well,the next hearing(Third hearing)please get your own lawyer here is it ok? which i replied ok but somehow,i really cant afford a lawyer now,in this case should i attend the third hearing without a Lawyer??? and what is the consequences if i did not attend???? Will the Court take my passport away or my asset such as car????


Very Concern,pls help,,
Jeantank

16 Sep, 2008 01:27:34

New MessageRE:Employer EPF matter in COURT Case.. (modified 0 times) Cynthia
Hi Jeantank,

How is your court case? Did you attend it?
Don't mind sharing it with us. Did the court
say that it won't allow instalments of 10-12?
I believe if you can pay that instalments,
why should the court/bank rejects when you are
willing to pay under very difficult financial
situation. What is the point of asking you
to pay in 6 instalments when you cannot afford
it?

The bank should understand it is better to get
some money rather than spending much on legal
proceedings against you and in the end, if you
are a bankrupt- the bank may get NOTHING or
a little bit !!! It is worth for the bank only
if you are the owner of assets/properties that
fetch good/practical monetary value. Can anyone
share the logic here? Thanks.

06 Oct, 2008 17:13:23


Post a New Message | Reply this Thread | Printer | Forward
All times are MYT


Copyright © 1999-2007 Lawyerment.com. All rights reserved

Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact | About Us | Advertising Opportunities | Press | Add URL | Submit Article | Contributors
Disclaimer - Please Read Carefully

These Bulletin Board pages are intended as a public service primarily to allow non-lawyers and lawyers to share experiences and opinions with other non-lawyers and lawyers. They are NOT intended to be a source of advertising, solicitation, legal advice, self-promotion or disparagement. Lawyerment assumes absolutely no responsibility for postings or their content. Visitors may post questions, comments and replies without prior review by Lawyerment, but we reserve the right to delete any postings (in whole or in part) for any reason at any time.
However, the fact that a posting remains on site NEVER means that it has been approved or endorsed by Lawyerment. By making a posting you are agreeing that the material you post becomes the property of Lawyerment. Lawyerment is a unit of Magnificent Communication. Visitors should exercise great caution when reading this (or any other) Bulletin Board. Be aware that those who post messages may not be who they claim to be. Never to rely on any advice in legal matters except from an attorney you have retained to represent you and your interests. To locate and retain an attorney we suggest you visit our Lawyerment Lawyers' Directory.
Click here to visit Lawyerment.com.my for 1000's of answers to legal questions. Please read our Privacy Policy and Disclaimer & Conditions Of Use.
Copyright © 1999-2007 Lawyerment.com. All rights reserved